<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Adrian Davies</title><link>https://davies.at/</link><description>Essays by Adrian Davies on infrastructure, compute, energy, Europe and building companies.</description><language>en</language><atom:link href="https://davies.at/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The ethics of quitting</title><link>https://davies.at/writing/the-ethics-of-quitting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://davies.at/writing/the-ethics-of-quitting/</guid><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Killing a startup before you take the money is more honourable than keeping a zombie alive for two years.</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Founders are taught that quitting is the one unforgivable sin. Grit is the virtue, persistence is the story, and every famous company nearly died at least once. So when the evidence says an idea isn’t working, most founders keep going anyway.</p>
<p>Before you raise, that is your call. It is your time and your savings. After you raise, it isn’t.</p>
<p>Taking someone’s money is a promise: that you believe this can become very large, and that you will tell them when you stop believing it. Zombie startups break the second half. The founders stopped believing months ago, quietly. The company keeps paying salaries, shipping features nobody asked for and sending cheerful investor updates, because shutting down feels like admitting failure and the runway makes it possible not to.</p>
<p>That is the expensive version of quitting. It costs two of the founders’ best working years. It costs the team two years of their careers, spent on something the people at the top no longer think will work. It costs money that could have backed someone who still believes. And the founders come out the other end tired, with a reputation for being hard to read rather than for being honest.</p>
<p>The cheap version is to decide before the money. Name the one or two things that have to be true, and how you would know within weeks rather than years. If they turn out to be false, stop. Write down what you learned, thank the people who helped, and walk away with your energy and your word intact.</p>
<p>Killing an idea before you take the money is not a failure of grit. It is grit pointed at the truth instead of at the story.</p>
<p>There are good reasons to keep going: real pull from users, a market moving towards you, a team that still believes and is right to. “We already raised” is not one of them.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Europe's leaky bucket: why my generation's founders are leaving</title><link>https://oecdcogito.blog/2025/11/12/europes-leaky-bucket-why-my-generations-founders-are-leaving/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://oecdcogito.blog/2025/11/12/europes-leaky-bucket-why-my-generations-founders-are-leaving/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Europe invests in talent but fails to build the runways for ideas to take off. A leaky bucket, and the missing 11 percent.</description></item><item><title>Mesh networking and the future of digital inclusion</title><link>https://davies.at/writing/mesh-networking-manets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://davies.at/writing/mesh-networking-manets/</guid><pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>How MANETs and decentralised systems reshape connectivity for the 2.6 billion people still offline.</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For most of us, connectivity is a given. But for 2.6 billion people, the internet remains out of reach. Enter MANETs (mobile ad hoc networks) and the new wave of mesh networking. These decentralised systems let devices connect directly, forming resilient, self-healing networks without relying on traditional telecom infrastructure.</p>
<p>My work on Meshara showed me how transformative this technology can be. Meshara nodes connect directly to smartphones and laptops, need no SIM card or special hardware, and are solar-powered for true autonomy.</p>
<p>Mesh networking is not just a technical innovation. It is a movement toward digital justice. By helping local communities build and own their networks, we can bridge the digital divide and create a more inclusive future.</p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Compliance in the age of remote work: lessons from DONNA</title><link>https://davies.at/writing/compliance-legaltech-donna/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://davies.at/writing/compliance-legaltech-donna/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description>Work from anywhere creates compliance drag. Treat policy as a system and the flow becomes legible.</description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remote work is here to stay, but with it comes a maze of compliance challenges. From tax residency to labour law, companies must navigate a patchwork of regulations that can change overnight. That is where legal tech comes in.</p>
<p>At WKO LegalTech Day, we introduced <strong>DONNA</strong>, an all-in-one global work-from-anywhere compliance concept powered by a retrieval-augmented system. DONNA automates complex cross-border checks that used to take hours.</p>
<p>Compliance is not just about ticking boxes. It is about enabling freedom and flexibility for workers everywhere.</p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>